Advertisement

Animal Advocates

Could the DA Reopen Cruelty Case Against Texas Cat-Killing Vet Kristen Lindsey?

No doubt you recall back in April 2015, when Kristen Lindsey, a Texas veterinarian, shot and killed a cat with a bow and arrow and then infamously bragged about it on Facebook, consequently losing her job and coming under fire from animal activists, the District Attorney’s office, and the Veterinary Board. In the post she bragged,  “My first bow kill, lol. The only good feral tomcat is one with an arrow through it’s head! Vet of the year award … gladly accepted.”

kristen-lindsey

A grand jury investigated the killing but unfortunately, in June 2015, found there was “insufficient proof” to charge Lindsey with animal cruelty. According to the Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF),

The Austin County District Attorney’s office then closed the case, claiming it could not confirm where the cat was killed, whether the cat had an owner, and whether the cat was killed “in a cruel manner.”

Earlier this year, in October 2016, the Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners voted to suspend Lindsey’s veterinary license for a period of one year, along with some additional probation and continuing education and community service. While it was the first disciplinary action she had received from the state since this whole saga began – most agreed it was too little, too late.

That said, In the months since the Austin County District Attorney’s Office refused to charge Lindsey with animal cruelty, the Animal Legal Defense Fund says new information has come to light that confirms Lindsey’s actions were criminal cruelty and that opens the door to prosecution. According to the ALDF:

  • Lindsey acknowledged in a signed affidavit appealing the Board’s revocation decision that the killing “occurred on [her] property” in Austin County, Texas.

  • Although the District Attorney’s office cited American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) guidelines for humane killing in its finding that Lindsey may not have killed the cat “in a cruel manner,” the AVMA released a statement rebutting the DA’s analysis.

  • Lindsey claimed the cat she killed was feral. Texas Penal Code Section 42.092(a)(2) includes feral cats under its definition of protected “animals.”

  • Texas Penal Code Section 42.092(b) prohibits killing an animal “without the owner’s effective consent.” If the cat was feral, there was no way to get the “effective consent” of a nonexistent owner. But Lindsey’s neighbors, who were out of town when the killing occurred, identified the cat in the photo as their cat Tiger, based on his distinctive markings. And according to the Board’s formal complaint against Lindsey, Tiger had been a patient at the Washington Animal Clinic—Lindsey’s former employer. In either case, Lindsey lacked an “owner’s effective consent.”

Given this new information, Animal Legal Defense Fund wrote the Austin County DA’s office requesting that it reopen the case. Click here to read the letter.

7 Comments

7 Comments

  1. Sheryl White

    Dec 1, 2016 at 1:14 pm

    Charge the witch!!!!!!!!!!!! She has no right to kill anyone’s pet! How dare she do this when she is suppose to be a veterinary. She is suppose to help animals not inhumanely kill them for the thrill of it. Even if the animal has no home (through no fault of it’s own) doesn’t mean you should put an arrow through it’s head. The way she celebrated the fact of what she did should be reason to charge with animal cruelty! She disgusts me!!!!!!!!! I just can’t believe she has just gotten a slap on the wrist so far. Throw the book at her!

    • Charlotte

      Dec 5, 2016 at 11:52 pm

      To think, I was couensfd a minute ago.

    • Magnificent points altogether, you just gained a new reader. What might you recommend in regards to your post that you made some days ago? Any certain?

    • kfz kredit 0 99

      Feb 11, 2017 at 10:38 am

      Thanks, friends! I’m glad this little project brings you a bit of joy and inspiration.Joscelyne, you can create a similar look with the pages of an acrylic album, a Crop-a-Dile and your favorite ribbon. Or, you can always make a trip to Utah and we’ll go on an IKEA run.

  2. Liz G

    Dec 2, 2016 at 9:18 am

    I agree! She should be charged with animal cruelty and lose her license! I certainly wouldn’t want to take my pets to a vet who thinks it’s OK to inhumanely kill an animal with a arrow thru it’s head. There’s just no excuse for that!

    • Dorothy

      Dec 2, 2016 at 3:45 pm

      I wish someone would put an arrow through her empty head. She has no right to kill a cat no matter what. She shou
      ld lose her license forever.

  3. Susan Onuma

    Dec 2, 2016 at 4:22 pm

    PLEASE REOPEN THIS CASE!!! THIS WITCH NEEDS TO BE PUNISHED!!!!!!! SHE NEEDS SOME SIGNIFICANT PRISON TIME AND HER LICENSE NEEDS TO BE REVOKED FOREVER!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Just when this dog-eat-dog world has handed you all the poop you can take, it's time to walk the dog. Or wash the dog. Or feed the dog. You get the idea. So welcome to the world of easy-to-care-for cats. Entertainment comes bundled in a furry, huggable, self-cleaning cat who won't beg for your food. In his eyes, you don't eat well enough anyway. Just keep a laser pen handy, sit back and wait for the fun to begin! Cats...ya gotta love 'em.

Become a Contributor!

Copyright © 2016 Catington Post.

To Top
shares
Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest cat news, recalls, and kitty contests!

You have Successfully Subscribed!